USPTO serial 76121025
HOUSEWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOUSEWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE H PRETTY
VALERIE BRENNAN HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMCLEAN, VA 22102-3609Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HOME ELECTRONICS, AUTOMATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, NAMELY, MUSIC AND AUDIO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, INFRARED CONTROL SYSTEMS, WHOLE HOUSE MUSIC SYSTEMS, MULTI-ROOM AUDIO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, HOME THEATER CONTROL SYSTEMS, RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS RESIDENTIAL ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS, RESIDENTIAL INTERCOM CONTROL SYSTEMS, VIDEO CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM, CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, WHOLE HOUSE VIDEO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, WHOLE HOUSE DATA NETWORK SYSTEMS, HOME NETWORK SYSTEMS, TELEPHONE CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, AND RESIDENTIAL TELEPHONY SYSTEMS, SAID SYSTEMS COMPRISING NAMELY, CONTROLLERS, AMPLIFIERS, PRE-AMPLIFIERS, RECEIVERS, REMOTE CONTROL SWITCHES, LOUDSPEAKERS, IN-WALL SPEAKERS, MODULES, CONNECTING BLOCKS, TELEVISION AND VIDEO MONITORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |