USPTO serial 76121175
PLANET SCOREBOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANET SCOREBOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK C. COMIOIS
MARK C COMIOIS DUANE MORRIS LLP1667 K ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY, NAMELY, COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF TECHNICAL DATA AND MEASURED TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE RESULTS; PROVIDING A WEBSITE FOR CUSTOMERS, ADVISORS, SERVICES AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL IN THE WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY TO REQUEST TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ScoreBoard, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN TELECOM, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLEN TELECOM, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named PLANET SCOREBOARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |