USPTO serial 76121206
THE GEE WHIZ KIDS IN SHAPELAND TRIODE TRIANGLE POWER PENTAGON CRESCENT MOON OVALINE OCTOPEDE RECDOOGLE HECTOR HECTAGON SUNNY CIRCLE DARING DIAMOND SQUAREBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE GEE WHIZ KIDS IN SHAPELAND TRIODE TRIANGLE POWER PENTAGON CRESCENT MOON OVALINE OCTOPEDE RECDOOGLE HECTOR HECTAGON SUNNY CIRCLE DARING DIAMOND SQUAREBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spring Branch, TX
Spring Branch, TX
Spring Branch, TX
Spring Branch, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Miller
MARK H MILLER JACKSON WALKER LLP112 E PECAN ST STE 2100SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed educational teaching materials for children concerning shapes and names | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Walter N.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Walter N.
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Amy Sue
- Other trademarks owned by Johnson, Amy Sue
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE GEE WHIZ KIDS IN SHAPELAND TRIODE TRIANGLE POWER PENTAGON CRESCENT MOON OVALINE OCTOPEDE RECDOOGLE HECTOR HECTAGON SUNNY CIRCLE DARING DIAMOND SQUAREBOT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |