USPTO serial 76121286
Q-VIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Q-VIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Western Australia 6017, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY HILLIARD &311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Equipment and apparatus for use in ophthalmic, medical, dental and veterinary surgery, namely, scanning, delivery and laser beam control systems incorporating a variable aperture, scanning and fixing lenses, software-driven controllers and drive motors for surgical laser; apparatus and parts and components thereof for use in refractive surgery for eye treatment; lasers and surgical apparatus incorporating lasers for use in eye treatment and parts and fittings therefore | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance, repair, and installation of equipment and apparatus for use in ophthalmic, medical, dental and veterinary surgery, and maintenance, repair and installation of lasers and apparatus incorporating lasers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Manufacture of equipment and apparatus for use in ophthalmic, medical, dental and veterinary surgery to the order and specification of to hers, and manufacture of lasers and apparatus incorporating lasers to the order and specification of others | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 042 | Leasing of ophthalmic, medical, dental, veterinary equipment and apparatus, including lasers for surgical purposes; operation of ophthalmic clinics, ophthalmology services, providing ophthalmic, medical, dental, surgical and veterinary assistance services using ophthalmic equipment and apparatus, lasers, or apparatus incorporating lasers, conducting clinical trials and research for ophthalmic, medical, dental, surgical and veterinary purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |