USPTO serial 76121364
TOMORROW FIRST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOMORROW FIRST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis J. Knobbe
LOUIS J KNOBBE KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTANCY SERVICES; BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES; ON-LINE BUSINESS DIRECTORIES FEATURING DATA, A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS AND SERVICES FOR PROCUREMENT PURPOSES AND OTHER BUSINESS INFORMATION; PUBLISHING DIRECTORIES AND DATA FOR BUSINESSES; PROCUREMENT OF A WIDE VARIETY OF GOODS ON BEHALF OF BUSINESSES; PROCUREMENT OF CONTRACTS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION (INCLUDING WEB PAGES), COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND ANY OTHER DATA; PROVIDING USER ACCESS TO THE INTERNET; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION THROUGH THE INTERNET, CABLENET OR OTHER FORMS OF DATA TRANSFER; COMPUTER AIDED TRANSMISSION OF DATA, SOUNDS, MESSAGES AND/OR IMAGES; TRANSMISSION OF DATA BY WAY OF SATELLITE, TELEGRAPH, TELEPHONE AND/OR CELLULAR TELEPHONE; TELECOMMUNICATION ACCESS SERVICES INCLUDING PROVIDING MULTIPLE USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATION PORTAL AND GATEWAY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES; DESIGN, DRAWING AND COMMISSIONED WRITING, ALL FOR THE COMPILATION OF WEB PAGES; CREATING, MAINTAINING, DESIGNING AND HOSTING WEB SITES; LEASING ACCESS TIME TO COMPUTER DATABASES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES; DESIGN, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION RELATING TO ALL THESE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality and Performance in Portals Limited,
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOMORROW FIRST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |