Drawing for CALLBACKMAGIC

USPTO serial 76121865

CALLBACKMAGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALLBACKMAGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas R. Wolf

DOUGLAS R WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS P600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING TELEPHONE LINE CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN COMPUTER USERS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROVIDED BY OTHERS IN ORDER TO FACILITATE LIVE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN CUSTOMER SUPPORT AND THIRD PARTIES VIA COMPUTER OR TELEPHONE CONTACTACTIVE—
042TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLE SHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA TELEPHONE, E-MAIL AND CHAT; PROVIDING A SEARCHABLE DATABASE OF INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 9, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 22, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 9, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 6, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 15, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance