Drawing for FREEWAY SERIES

USPTO serial 76121920

FREEWAY SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEWAY SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin

MARY L KEVLIN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS, VISORS, KNITTED HEADWEAR, HEADBANDS, BANDANNAS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, SWEATERS, TURTLENECKS, PULLOVERS, VESTS, SHORTS, PANTS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, OVERALLS, BODYSUITS, BASEBALL UNIFORMS, JERSEYS, WARM-UP SUITS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, UNDERWEAR, BOXER SHORTS, ROBES, SLEEPWEAR, SWIMWEAR, CLOTHING WRAPS, COATS, JACKETS, PONCHOS, RAINCOATS, CLOTH BIBS, INFANTWEAR, INFANT DIAPER COVERS, CLOTH DIAPER SETS WITH UNDERSHIRT AND DIAPER COVER, JUMPERS, ROMPERS, COVERALLS, CREEPERS, BABY BOOTIES, TIES, SUSPENDERS, BELTS, MONEY BELTS, MITTENS, GLOVES, WRISTBANDS, EARMUFFS, SCARVES, FOOTWEAR, SOCKS, HOSIERY, SLIPPERS, APRONS, SLIDING GIRDLES, HALLOWEEN AND MASQUERADE COSTUMES AND MASKS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL RELATING TO OR PROMOTING BASEBALL GAMES AND EXHIBITIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 19, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 31, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 16, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance