USPTO serial 76122119
DEUTSCHE POST EURO EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEUTSCHE POST EURO EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul E. Fahrenkopf
Anthony J. Malutta Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transport of goods, parcels, mail matters, small packets, consignments of written communications and other messages, especially letters, postcards, printed matter, consignments of goods, circulars, addressed and unaddressed advertising consignments, book consignments, consignments for blind people, newspapers, magazines, printed papers via bicycles, motor vehicles, rail cars, ships and planes; storage of goods before transport of after in case of unavailability of the recipient; collecting, forwarding and delivering of the afore-mentioned sendings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |