USPTO serial 76122125
RAKU ICHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2843402Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2004
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RAKU ICHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael James Cronen
Michael James Cronen Zimmerman & Cronen, LLP1330 Broadway, Suite 710Oakland, CA 94612-2506UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Rice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 5, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |