Drawing for FRIENDSHIP

USPTO serial 76122161

FRIENDSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIENDSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC6500 CITY W PKWYMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55343-9056UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat, fish and shellfish, poultry and game, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams, fruit sauces, eggs, milk, milk powder and dairy products, namely, cheese, edible oils and fatsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance