USPTO serial 76122292
PROFILE/ANYWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFILE/ANYWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP1650 MARKET ST STE 2500ONE LIBERTY PLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INTEGRATED COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND APPLICATIONS FOR USE IN BANKING AND OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICES MANAGEMENT AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATED TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SOFTWARE AND PROCESSORS FOR RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL DEPOSITS AND LOANS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | CUSTOMER INFORMATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ONLINE AND BATCH DATA CAPTURE SERVICES; DEPOSIT ACCOUNT PROCESSING SERVICES; LOAN ACCOUNT PROCESSING SERVICES; AUTOMATION IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |