USPTO serial 76122362
LABCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LABCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry J. Parker
BARRY J PARKER CARR, MCCLELLAN, INGERSOL,THOMPSON216 PARK RDBURLINGAME, CA 94010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Reagents for diagnostic testing and scientific research and kits primarily composed of reagents for diagnostic testing for detecting pathogens in the environment, for use with microvolume laboratory devices, namely, microfluidic array platforms for mixing, incubating, metering, diluting, purifying, capturing, concentrating, injecting, separating and detecting tiny volumes of liquid for scientific and medical research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | reagents for diagnostic testing and medical laboratory use and kits primarily composed of reagents for diagnostic testing and medical laboratory use for detecting pathogens in the environment, for use with microvolume laboratory devices, namely, microfluidic array platforms for mixing, incubating, metering, diluting, purifying, capturing, concentrating, injecting, separating and detecting tiny volumes of liquid for scientific and medical research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Microvolume laboratory devices, namely, assay and separation plates, chips, cassettes and kits containing these plates, chips, and cassettes for storing, reconstituting, dissolving, mixing, incubating, metering, distributing, diluting, purifying, capturing, concentrating, injecting, separating, detecting and analyzing tiny volumes of liquid containing, dissolved and suspended moeties for scientific monitoring and control, diagnostic and research use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |