Drawing for BOSTON BREAKERS

USPTO serial 76122629

BOSTON BREAKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSTON BREAKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Emily J. Barnhart

EMILY J BARNHART BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Posters, calendars, notebooks, pens, bumper stickers, window blind, pencils, stationery, playing cardsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely T-shirts, sweatshirts, Jerseys, shorts, sweat pants, jackets, hats/caps, scarves, gloves, footwear, rainwear, bandanas, headbandsACTIVE—
028Toy figures, soccer balls, plush toysACTIVE—
041Educational services in the nature of soccer camps and clinicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 24, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 10, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance