USPTO serial 76122737
TOPLESS NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 21, 2003
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOPLESS NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy L. Tissot
JEREMY L TISSOT CALLAHAN, MCCUNE & WILLIS LLP11755 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1543UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Broadcast and distribution of quality adult programming with a variety of entertainment formats and productions hosted by men and women topless, through the world wide web, internet and other audio/visual media, including phone, satellite, cable television and radio | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 12, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |