USPTO serial 76123119
TREVOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREVOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Elgin,
CNN JENNIFER L ELGIN,C/O TURNER BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INCP O BOX 105573ATLANTA, GA 30348-5573Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment and education services in the nature of a continuing program series and motion picture films directed toward children and young adults, provided through cable television, broadcast television, broadcast radio and the global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |