Drawing for DTW

USPTO serial 76123378

DTW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DTW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. W. Johnston

R W JOHNSTON CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP O BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC, OPTO-ELECTRONIC, ANALOG, DIGITAL, WIRE-BASED AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, PRIVATE BRANCH EXCHANGES, SWITCHING DEVICES, ROUTERS; TELEPHONES; TELEPHONE SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SYSTEM TELEPHONES; APPARATUS FOR ACQUISITION, COMPUTING, BROADCASTING, TRANSMITTING, EXCHANGING, STORING, RECEIVING AND OUTPUTTING OF SPEECH, TEXT AND DATA, NAMELY, TELEPHONE CONNECTION COMPUTER HARDWARE ROUTERS AND SWITCHING DEVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, MODEMS, ANALOG TO DIGITAL AND DIGITAL TO ANALOG CONVERTERS, DATA OUTPUT PRINTERS AND PLOTTERS, PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS AND CASSETTE DRIVE ASSEMBLIES FOR HARD-DISCS, COMPUTER TAPES, FLOPPY DISCS; TELEPHONE CONNECTION COMPUTER SOFTWARE ROUTERS AND SOFTWARE SWITCHING DEVICES; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR CONTROL OF PRIVATE BRANCH EXCHANGES AND TELEPHONE SYSTEMS IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 3, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance