USPTO serial 76123828
E-BUSINESS IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-BUSINESS IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINSTE 1000, VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Internet commerce computer software to build and manage electronic commerce on the global computer network, namely, computer software to assist in cataloging, market analysis, financial transactions, merchandising, promotion, customer relationship, and developing on-line communities, and all used to build and manage on-line electronic stores; computer software for analyzing data, namely data mining software, knowledge discovery software, and statistical analysis software; computer games software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line marketing, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronics communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Videotape production and editing and audio production and editing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services, computer system integration services for others, computer programming for others, website design for others, computer software development for others featuring CD Rom development, 3D animation development and motion graphics development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLAST RADIUS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BLAST RADIUS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E-BUSINESS IMPACT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |