Drawing for WISHES AND PRAYERS

USPTO serial 76123876

WISHES AND PRAYERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WINTER, ELIZABETH
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WISHES AND PRAYERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark V. Muller

MARK V MULLER JENKENS & GILCHRIST PC1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2785UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PHILANTHROPIC SERVICES IN THE AREA OF DONATIONS OF TOYSACTIVEJan 23, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 2, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 30, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 3, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 29, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 4, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 5, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance