USPTO serial 76124033
AIRHEART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRHEART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Eisenhut
HEIDI L EISENHUT GORDON & REES LLP101 W BROADWAY STE 1600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Rubber stamps and paper goods, namely, greeting cards, calendars, photographic pictures, posters and lithographic artwork | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Stained glass artwork and glass ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, tank tops, blouses, vests, shorts, pants, sweatshirts, jackets, socks, nightshirts, neck ties, caps, gloves and undergarments, namely, boxer shorts, briefs and panties | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Airheart, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Airheart, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AIRHEART
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |