Drawing for SHARPMEDIA

USPTO serial 76124044

SHARPMEDIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SHARPMEDIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Clifford

JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software; computer hardware; wireless devices; printed materials; clothing; advertising and promotional services; provision of business information, including that provided on-line from a computer database by means of web pages on the Internet; consultancy and advice relating to the evaluation, choosing and implementation of computer software, firmware, hardware and of data processing systems; rental and licensing of computer software, firmware and hardware; on-line information services; education, information, communication and entertainment services including that provided through a website on a global computer network or firm computer databases featuring information; providing online access; and computer services; management advice, consultancy, information and research services; consulting services in the field of technology and information technology; consultancy, advice, assistance, analysis, design, evaluation and programming services relating to computer software, firmware and hardware; web site consulting, development, information and marketing services; e-commerce development services; intranet development services; intranet consulting services; consulting services relating to the development of product prototypes for the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance