USPTO serial 76124375
NIRVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NIRVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Weiss
MANNY D POKOTILOW CAESAR RIVISE BERNSTEIN COHEN & POKOTILO11TH FL1635 MARKET ST SEVEN PENN CTRPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and cleaning preparations, namely perfumes, colognes, room fragrances, skin lotions, body lotions, face lotions, eye creams, eye makeup, cosmetic serums, foundation powders and foundation lotions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 20, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |