USPTO serial 76124517
DIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & 2 PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | training services for telecommunications equipment, computer hardware and computer software for use in providing content on demand, namely movies, movie previews and trailers, videos, multimedia content and audio content in a wide variety of fields and on a wide variety of topics; education and entertainment services, namely, production for others of television, satellite television, cable television, video, audio, or multimedia programming in the fields of news and matters of general interest, business, finance, consumer information, drama, comedy, historical events, historical figures, public information, or the arts, all by means of electronic communications networks, telecommunications networks, cable or broadcast television networks, or satellite communication networks; distribution for others of television, cable television, video, audio, or multimedia programming in the fields of news and matters of general interest, business, finance, consumer information, drama, comedy, historical events, historical figures, public information, or the arts, all by means of electronic communications networks, telecommunications networks, cable or broadcast television networks, or satellite communication networks; providing information in the fields of drama or comedy, historical events, historical figures or the arts, by means of electronic communication networks, telecommunications networks, cable or broadcast television networks, or satellite communication networks; providing broadcast television and cable television content; production and distribution of interactive or on demand television and cable television services; providing multimedia content, namely content that includes a combination of text, spoken audio, music, images animation and video, and providing movies, movie previews, videos, audio, television and cable television content, and information and data in a wide variety of fields via telecommunications networks, cable or broadcast television networks and electronic communications networks; all excluding such services provided in the field of integrated services digital networks; providing an interactive computer database for direct access to available television, cable television, movie, video, and audio programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |