USPTO serial 76124749
E.CABIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E.CABIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LORI M. STOCKTON
LORI M STOCKTON BLAKELY, SOKOLOFF, TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR AIRCRAFT CONSISTING OF VIDEO DISPLAYS AND DISPLAYS CONTROLS, TUNERS, RECEIVERS, AMPLIFIERS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISC PLAYERS AND SOUND CARDS, ADAPTER, PORT EXPANSION, CONTROLLER, DECODER, GRAPHICS ACCELERATOR BOARDS, COMPUTER, MULTIPLEXING, GRAPHICS AND VIDEO HARDWARE, FIRMWARE AND SOFTWARE, ALL FOR FACILITATING COMPUTER AUDIO, VIDEO, TEXT, PICTURES AND GRAPHICS BROADCAST, RECEPTION TRANSMISSION AND DISPLAY | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF MULTIMEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR AIRCRAFT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DECRANE AIRCRAFT HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Bombardier Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named E.CABIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |