USPTO serial 76125163
WRITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori M. Stockton
LORI M STOCKTON BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR ET AL12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer peripherals, namely, a wireless input device for use in communicating with computers and a global computer and telecommunications network, for direct transmission of handwritten notes via a global computer and telecommunications network, for storage and retrieval of notes, and for signature verification for electronic commerce; computer software for use in communicating with computers and a global computer and telecommunications network, for direct transmission of handwritten notes via a global computer and telecommunications network, for storage and retrieval of notes, and for signature verification for electronic commerce; computer hardware and peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |