USPTO serial 76125531
QUESTFIBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUESTFIBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
ROBERT E PURCELL WALL MARJAMA & BILINSKI LLP101 S SALINA ST STE 400SYRACUSE, NY 13202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for monitoring and testing optical networks, and locating system/fiber degradation | ABANDONED | Jan 29, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |