Drawing for NOT JUST TALK

USPTO serial 76125978

NOT JUST TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENNINGS, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOT JUST TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth McGoogan Magnuson

ELIZABETH MCGOOGAN MAGNUSON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telecommunications products, namely telephones; video teleconferencing products, namely switches, modems, speakers, video displays, cameras, microphones, cables, and conductors; apparatus for recording, transmission, reception, processing, or reproduction of sound, images and/or data, namely, switches, modems, speakers, video displays, cameras, microphones, cables, and conductors all for digital, electrical, electronic, radio frequency, telecommunications, or optical signal transmission; computer hardware and software for reproduction, manipulation, analysis, display, and/or print-out of sound, images, and/or dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2003REINREINSTATED—
Jun 2, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance