USPTO serial 76126106
CHETRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHETRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J SPRINKLE
PAUL A TONELLA LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBBERSON2600 TWO UN SQ 601 UN STSEATTLE, WA 98101-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | GENERAL PURPOSE POLISHING POWDER, NAMELY, GARNET POWDER FOR USE AS A POLISH TO PRODUCE A HIGH GLOSS FINISH | ACTIVE | Jun 23, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |