USPTO serial 76126400
HOTTIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOTTIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT AND EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION of audio recordings, motion pictures, multimedia entertainment software, multimedia entertainment software to be used on the Internet, radio programs, television programs, theatrical plays and videotapes; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE APPEARANCES OR PERFORMANCES by animals, athletes, celebrities, dancers, entertainers, models, movie stars, musical artists, other artists; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONS AND SPORTING EVENTS OF ALL TYPES, namely, camps, clinics, contests, exhibitions, tournaments; PROVIDING FACILITIES for dancing, exercise, gambling, recreation activities; MISCELLANEOUS ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, namely, amusement arcades, amusement parks, animation production services, arranging for ticket reservations for shows and other entertainment events, dubbing services, entertainment in the nature of amusement park rides, entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants, entertainment in the nature of craft shows, entertainment in the nature of fashion shows, entertainment in the nature of garden shows, entertainment in nature of wedding shows, entertainment, namely, preparation of special effects, fan clubs, figure salons, film and video editing, health clubs, lottery services, music composition for others, officiating at sports contests, organizing community festivals featuring a variety of activities, namely, sporting events, art exhibitions, flea markets, ethnic dances and the like, party planning, rental of motion pictures, rental of sound recordings, rental of video games, rental of videotapes, script writing services, song writing services, timing of sports events; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, namely, dance schools, educational services in the nature of beauty schools, educational services, namely, conducting classes, conferences, seminars and workshops in the fields of diet and nutrition, entrepreneurship, fashion, sales and marketing, self-awareness, self-motivation and sports, educational services, namely, providing incentives to people to demonstrate excellence in the field of sales through the issuance of awards, educational services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers, physical fitness instruction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |