USPTO serial 76126526
OPERATION EYESIGHT UNIVERSAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPERATION EYESIGHT UNIVERSAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F. Moldovanyi
JAY F MOLDOVANYI SUPERIORFAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | May 27, 1981 |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops for medical personnel and others in the field of blindness prevention and sight restoration surgery in the developing world | ACTIVE | May 27, 1981 |
| 042 | medical services, namely, sight restoration surgery necessary to restore sight to the curable blind; charitable services, namely, the collection, repair and distribution of used eyewear | ACTIVE | May 27, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Operation Eyesight Universal
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OPERATION EYESIGHT UNIVERSAL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |