USPTO serial 76126583
CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK MILES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 25, 2003
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK MILES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carlo F. Van den Bosch
Carlo F. Van den Bosch Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP650 Town Center DriveFourth FloorCosta Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the travel services of others by awarding mileage points for credit card use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BANAMEX USA
- Other trademarks owned by CITIBANK (BANAMEX USA)
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK
- Other trademarks owned by CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CALIFORNIA COMMERCE BANK MILES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |