USPTO serial 76126609
VTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors for machines; Couplings and belts for machines; Agricultural implements other than hand operated, namely, plowing machines, cultivating machines, harvesting machines, machines for making fibrous agricultural aid products, fodder presses, feed cutters, feed mixers, feed mills | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Repair and maintenance services for motors, namely, automobile motors, motorcycle motors, motorized wheelbarrow motors, and motors for motorized land vehicles, machine couplings and belting, agricultural implements, vehicles, namely, automobiles, motorcycles, motorized wheelbarrows and motorized land vehicles, engines for automobiles, engines for motorcycles, engines for other motorized land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named VTEC
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |