USPTO serial 76126630
INTELLIGENT RENDERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLIGENT RENDERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Kelly
DAVID M KELLY FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT& DUNNER, LLPWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in designing, developing, debugging, testing, deploying, running, maintaining, managing, monitoring, and reporting on applications, websites, software, and databases for an enterprise; computer software for providing access to applications, websites, software, and databases through voice activation, key-pad, stylus, and touch-screen interfaces on mobile and fixed communications devices, computers, telephones, and small format devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider services, namely, providing, hosting, managing, and maintaining applications, software, websites, and databases for others; computer software design and development for others; computer programming services; consultation services in the fields of website design, software, wireless communications, and delivery of content, data, and information to mobile and fixed communications devices, computers, telephones, and small format devices; designing and implementing applications for others to facilitate the transfer, translation, and adaptation of data through voice activation, key-pad, stylus, and touch-screen interfaces on mobile and fixed communications devices, computers, telephones, and small format devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |