USPTO serial 76127133
DIGITAL OILFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3443104Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2008
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIGITAL OILFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan E. Hollander, Esq.
Susan E. Hollander, Esq. K&L Gates630 Hansen WayPalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for business to business e-commerce services in the international oil and gas industry, namely, software used to facilitate the receipt, coding and authorization of invoices; computer software for business to business e-commerce services in the international oil and gas industry, namely, software for workflow coordination and automation, including planning, scheduling, procuring and conduction of tasks; computer software for business to business e-commerce services in the international oil and gas industry, namely, software that automates financial, operational and business workflow processes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | licensing of computer software for use in business-to-business electronic commerce in the field of oil and gas exploration | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | provision of a site on the global computer network offering business to business e-commerce services to the international oil and gas industry, namely, inter-business communication, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; electronic data transmission for business to business communication services, business to business collaboration services and business to business e-commerce services by way of a global computer information network and internet site. | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating indexes of information on computer networks for automated financial, operational and business workflow services in business-to-business electronic commerce in the oil and gas industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | provision of a site on the global computer network offering business to business e-commerce services to the international oil and gas industry, namely, providing user authentication services in e-commerce transactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ADP P2P CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL OILFIELD INC
- Other trademarks owned by DIGITAL OILFIELD INC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named DIGITAL OILFIELD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |