USPTO serial 76127436
INFOSOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFOSOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
Brookfield, WI
Other trademarks owned by International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
Brookfield, WI
Other trademarks owned by International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL E. KATTMAN
DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN ET AL1000 N WATER ST STE 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | compact disks featuring information pertaining to employee benefits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INFOSOURCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |