Drawing for HARRODS

USPTO serial 76127969

HARRODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HARRODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lile H. Deinard

DIANE DONNELLY VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN JANSSEN60 E 42ND ST STE 4410NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Hotel services, restaurant services, bar services, cafe services, and beauty salon and hairdressing servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 22, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 22, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 9, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance