Drawing for EXEC

USPTO serial 76128608

EXEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EXEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven J. Nataupsky

STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY, CULTURE, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND INFORMATION SERVICESACTIVE
035ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS, EXPOSITIONS, EXHIBITIONS, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, SYMPOSIUMS, COLLOQUIUMS AND DISCUSSION GROUPS IN THE FIELDS OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INFORMATION SERVICES; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA AN ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PREPARING AND PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS ON A WEB SITE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE
038PROVIDING A WEB SITE IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY, CULTURE, COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ONLINE SERVICES, HIGH TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND INFORMATION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 5, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance