USPTO serial 76128617
URISYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URISYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-66305 Mannheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter F. Felfe
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | In-vitro diagnostic agents and reagents for medical purposes; control solutions and calibration strips for medical purposes, | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Software programs and computer hardware for medical purposes, | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical instruments and apparatus for analyzing and evaluating in-vitro diagnostic tests; medical apparatus for the detection of substances in urine; dispenser for the distribution and selection of reagent and selection of reagent carriers for medical purposes, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |