USPTO serial 76128921
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI
LESLIE BERTAGNOLI BAKER & MCKENZIE130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500ONE PRUDENTIAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and electrical equipment namely, computers, handheld computers, communication devices, namely, miniature computer that is inserted in household appliances and which allows for remote control of these appliances via the household electrical wiring system; telephones, mobile telephones and wireless pagers; computer software programs for use in design, development, modeling, simulation, computer software programs for use in design, development, modeling simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction and interfacing of electrical and electronic equipment; computer software, namely, operating system programs, computer utility programs and programs for providing remote control of household appliances | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, mobile telephone and wireless messaging services via satellite | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research, development, design and consulting services related to electrical and electronic equipment, computers, handheld computers, telephones, mobile telephones, communication devices, wireless information devices, computer software programs, operating system programs, utility programs, application programs, computer software for the design, development, modeling, simulation, compiling, de-bugging, verification, construction, interfacing of electrical and electronic equipment and computers; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via phone, e-mail, on the Internet and in person; maintenance of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |