USPTO serial 76129110
RAYBLAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAYBLAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shibuya-ku, tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Kruse
PAUL W KRUSE PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP1600 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | APPARATUS AND MACHINES FOR CHEMICAL INDUSTRY, NAMELY, LIGHT IRRADIATION DEVICE THAT PROMOTE REACTION OF CHEMISTRY MATTER, PRESSES, MIXING MACHINES, FILTERING MACHINES, CONDENSING INSTALLATIONS, DRYING MACHINES, SEPARATORS; PRINTING APPARATUS AND MACHINES, NAMELY, LIGHT IRRADIATION DEVICE THAT PROMOTE HARDENING OF PRINT INK, GRAVURE PRINTING MACHINES, TYPOGRAPHIC MACHINES, OFFSET PRINTING MACHINES; BOOKBINDING APPARATUS AND MACHINES, NAMELY, LIGHT IRRADIATION DEVICE THAT PROMOTE HARDENING OF BACK GLUE, BOOKBINDING APPARATUS AND MACHINES FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES, BACK GLUING AND DRYING DEVICE OR THE LIKE, CUTTERS; APPARATUS AND MACHINES FOR PLASTIC PROCESS, NAMELY, INJECTION MOLDING MACHINES, EXTRUSION MOLDING MACHINES, INFLATION MOLDING MACHINES, VACUUM MOLDING MACHINES, BLOW MOLDING MACHINES, COMPRESSION MOLDING MACHINES OR THE LIKE, APPARATUS FOR PLASTICS DRESSING; SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTION APPARATUS AND MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINE FOR COATING PHOTOSENSITIVITY RESIN ON SILICON WAFER, MACHINE FOR FORMING MICRO ELECTRONIC CIRCUIT PATTERN ON SILICON WAFER BY PHOTO ETCHING, IC TESTER; COATING APPARATUS AND MACHINES; AND LIGHT IRRADIATION DEVICE THAT PROMOTE HARDENING OF PLASTICS AND GLUE | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | MEDICAL, SURGICAL, DENTAL, AND VETERINARY APPARATUS, MACHINES AND INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |