USPTO serial 76129409
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Besmark, NE, US
Bismarck, ND, US
Besmark, NE, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, neckwear, headwear, top coats, coats, tops, dresses, robes, sweaters, sweatshirts, tuxedos, visors, waistcoats, walking shorts, wedding gowns, suits, wraps, veils, vests, underwear, under garments, athletic shoes, suits, bandanas, coats, sweat pants, shirts, shorts, swimwear, tennis wear, shawls, skating outfits, ski gloves, footwear, boots, infantwear, pants, slacks, jeans, skiwear, sleepwear, slippers, snowwear, gloves, wind resistant jackets, sport coats, sport shirts, parkas, playsuits, polo shirts, rainwear, scarves, lingerie, mini-skirts, sweaters, night gowns, pajamas, leather coats, leather jackets, leotards, leggings, flight suits, uniforms, foundation garments, gym shorts, Halloween costumes, costumes for role-playing games, sweat pants, head bands, Bermuda shorts, body shapers, body suits, boxer briefs, boxer shorts, bras, athletic uniforms, bath robes, beachwear | ACTIVE | Oct 7, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 24, 2022 | RGTD | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB DECISION REVERSED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 5, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 4, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2016 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |