USPTO serial 76129416
F.U.N.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with F.U.N.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
Sherman Oaks, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
Sherman Oaks, CA
Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
Dax Alvarez SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.400 East Van Buren StreetSuite 1900Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | [ Broadcasting over electronic media, namely, radio, television, and the Internet; ] Streaming of audio and video material over the Internet; [ electronic transmission of messages and data via the Internet ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST DESCENDANTS TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by TRUSTEES OF THE ZAPPA TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks owned by THE ZAPPA FAMILY TRUST
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named F.U.N.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |