USPTO serial 76130262
TSUYA-PATA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TSUYA-PATA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto city, Kyoto Pref, JP
Nakagyo-ku, Kyoto city, Kyoto Pref, JP
Kyoto city, Kyoto Pref., JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STACEY R. HALPERN
STACEY R HALPERN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, SKIN CLEANERS AND SOAPS, SHAVING SOAPS, FACIAL CLEANSERS, FACIAL SCRUBS, CREAMS, EMOLLIENTS, LOTIONS, MASKS, MOISTURIZERS, CONDITIONERS, BODY CREAMS, EMULSIONS; HAIR STYLING MOISTURIZERS, CONDITIONERS; AFTER-SUN LOTIONS; SELF-TANNING SKIN PREPARATIONS; MOISTURIZING SUNSCREENS; SCRUBS; ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS; HAND CREAMS; SHAVING CREAMS, LOTIONS; AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; ALL PURPOSE HOUSEHOLD DEGREASING PREPARATIONS, PERFUMES, COLOGNES, EAU DE TOILETTE, PERFUME OILS; DENTURE CLEANING PREPARATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |