Drawing for VIP TONE

USPTO serial 76130542

VIP TONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIP TONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Anderson

ROBERT L ANDERSON LANAHAN & REILLEY LLP600 BICENTENNIAL WAY, STE 300SANTA ROSA, CA 95403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely communication servers; Communications software for connecting computer network users; Computer software for K-12 education that may be downloaded from a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Computerized on-line ordering services in the field computer hardware and software for K-12 education programs; Computerized on-line retail services in the field of computer hardware and software for K-12 education programsACTIVE—
037Computer installation and repair; Installation of computer networks; Installation of computer systemsACTIVE—
038Network conferencing servicesACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely providing on-line, kindergarten, elementary school and high school level educational oriented programs and providing course materials in connection therewith via an on-line high speed global computer networkACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others, designing and implementing web sites for others, providing databases general and local news, and information of interest to specific geographic areas, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; Computer site design; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Integration of computer systems and networks; Computer consultationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 10, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance