USPTO serial 76130866
REINCARNATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, KHANH M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REINCARNATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD B. DOMPIERI
ARNOLD B DOMPIERI LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG ET AL600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Peroxides for use on the hair, hair bleaching preparations, hair dyes, permanent wave preparations, body volumizers for the hair, hair relaxing preparations, facial lotions, facial creams, facial masks, facial oils, toners, facial emulsions, lipsticks, eyeliners, eye shadows and eye makeup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |