USPTO serial 76130886
VICTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VICTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FREDENSBORG, DK
Fredensborg, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori Krafte
LORI KRAFTE GREENNEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | live roses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | TCAL | TEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |