USPTO serial 76131166
VISIONSPEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIONSPEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
INTRAMEDICA CORP
2150 NW 93RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33172-4803UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | DISPOSABLE MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS-NAMELY VAGINAL SPECULUM AND PARTS THEREFOR, SIGMOIDOSCOPES, LARYNGOSCOPES | ACTIVE | Nov 11, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |