Drawing for M-PHORIC

USPTO serial 76131225

M-PHORIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COOK, BRADLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M-PHORIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy O. Dix

JOHN M KIM GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPSTE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer, video and audio recordings made on discs, tapes, cassettes, cartridges, records, digital video disks, super audio disks, and digital audio tapes all featuring music and/or voice; microphones, sound amplifiers, audio mixers, audio mixing consoles and audio mixing boards, audio controllers for sound recording, audio recorders, audio recording systems consisting of an analog or digital sound recorder, namely, tape, compact disc, digital audio tape, minidisk, or computer hard drive, a device for capturing sound, namely, a device for converting sound waves into an electrical or optical signal, mixing board, limiter/compressor, equalizer, and/or analog/digital converter; audio recording play-back systems consisting of an audio sound player, namely, analog tape, compact disc, digital audio tape, minidisk, or computer hard drive, power amplifier, preamplifier, digital/analog converter and/or speakers; audio recording reproduction systems consisting of an audio sound player, namely, analog tape, compact disc, digital audio tape, minidisk, or computer hard drive, power amplifier, preamplifier, digital/analog converter and/or speakers; and computer hardware and software for human voice recognitionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance