USPTO serial 76131327
KAN TONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAN TONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Kelly, Esq
TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |