Drawing for STATE OF THE NEW ECONOMY

USPTO serial 76131329

STATE OF THE NEW ECONOMY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODSAID, IRA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STATE OF THE NEW ECONOMY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LISA ROSENBURG

LISA ROSENBURGH SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Audio and video recordings featuring news and information in the filed of the new economy; for business use; and multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM containing business-related subject matterACTIVE—
035Advertising services, namely, placing advertisements for others in print and online magazines, and on an Internet website; and providing information in the field of the new economy, namely regarding new practices and new ideas that surround how companies compete and people workACTIVE—
038Providing online chat room services in the field of the new economyACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting educational and entertainment conferences, seminars, roundtable discussions and forums in the field of the new economyACTIVE—
042computer services, namely providing an online magazine in the field of the new economy and providing online news in the field of the new economyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 30, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 10, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 9, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 28, 2001DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2001DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance