USPTO serial 76131329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CHICAGO, IL
Fast Company Media Group, L L.C.
New York, NY
GRUNER + JAHR PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by GRUNER + JAHR PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY
GRUNER + JAHR PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by GRUNER + JAHR PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LISA ROSENBURG
LISA ROSENBURGH SULLIVAN & WORCESTER LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video recordings featuring news and information in the filed of the new economy; for business use; and multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM containing business-related subject matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, placing advertisements for others in print and online magazines, and on an Internet website; and providing information in the field of the new economy, namely regarding new practices and new ideas that surround how companies compete and people work | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing online chat room services in the field of the new economy | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting educational and entertainment conferences, seminars, roundtable discussions and forums in the field of the new economy | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely providing an online magazine in the field of the new economy and providing online news in the field of the new economy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |