USPTO serial 76131363
ARCOTECT THE ARCHITECT OF THE NEW BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARCOTECT THE ARCHITECT OF THE NEW BUSINESS ECOSYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E Marames
WILLIAM E MARAMES PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, MARKETING, CUSTOMER RELATIONS, ACCOUNTING, PURCHASING, AND HUMAN RESOURCES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTING RESEARCH, AND SYSTEMS ANALYSIS IN THE FIELDS OF ELECTRONIC BUSINESS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN, INFORMATION SYSTEMS HARDWARE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE; ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER NETWORK DESIGN SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |